Friday, October 31, 2025
Thursday, October 30, 2025
Wednesday, October 29, 2025
Tuesday, October 28, 2025
Monday, October 27, 2025
Sunday, October 26, 2025
Saturday, October 25, 2025
Friday, October 24, 2025
Multiculturalism Is A Globalist Weapon And You’re Not Allowed To Protect Yourself
Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.us
If you were alive to witness the events of 9/11, you probably remember the sudden emergence of the “Coexist” bumper stickers and t-shirts across the US after the tragedy. The intended message being that different cultures must be “tolerant” of each other and live in harmony. If you caught yourself with a twinge of visible pain in your face every time you saw this slogan, you were not alone.
Maybe it’s a subconscious aversion to hippies and their body odor, but I think the distaste for the message goes much deeper. It’s built into the DNA of every human being – It’s a part of our genetic memory. Every culture has an inherent drive to protect itself from competing cultures and ideologies.
We have learned over thousands of generations that culture is not just social expression, it is a carefully crafted fortress protecting us from being invaded and destroyed by hostile forces seeking to take what we have created. Homogeneous culture helps to maintain the values that keep our societies safe, industrious and stable.
Interestingly, the person who first created the “Coexist” artwork, a Polish man named Piotr MÅ‚odożeniec, was a staunch proponent of Polish Independence from the Soviet Union. The guy promoted Coexistence, but even he couldn’t tolerate the communists. It would seem that some ideals are mutually exclusive. Some spaces cannot be shared by certain beliefs.
This reality runs contrary to the propaganda we have been bombarded with in the west for decades. Americans have been regaled with “Melting Pot” narratives since childhood. We are told that our country was built on open immigration. Even the Statue of Liberty says we must accept with open arms the “huddled masses yearning to breathe free” wherever they may travel from.
Of course, the woman who wrote that poem in 1883 (called “The New Colossus”) was Emma Lazarus, a feminist socialist. Early socialists viewed workers as a global class, a weapon that could be exploited to disrupt nation states and further the spread of what would eventually become communism.
Keep in mind that this time period was the beginning of the melting pot narrative in the US, and it was widely supported by industrialists seeking cheap labor to fill their factories. The motives of the robber barons and the motives of the socialists coincided. And this is where we find the roots of our modern-day crisis. Though they pretend to be at odds, the collusion between ultra-rich elites and the political left has existed for well over a century.
Today, far-left movements have completely merged with the institutions of the mega-rich. We call this partnership “globalism” and a key pillar of their agenda is STILL mass immigration, on a scale that dwarfs anything the west saw in the late 1800s and early 1900s.
The mass immigration of the “Gilded Age” was largely from nations in Europe with western heritage – But in our era, the migrants are coming from third-world enclaves, places where socialism is the norm or Islam is the dominant religion. We have seen the ideological ravages of this program in Europe where liberals and Christians alike face a social brutality that they have not dealt with in decades.
Furthermore, it is a brutality we are not allowed to defend ourselves against. For if we do fight back, we become the villains. This is what makes multiculturalism the perfect weapon: It is a method of attack that uses our own ingrained sense of empathy and fairness against us. In order to stop the invasion, we have to abandon certain ideals of the liberal epoch – We have to embrace intolerance, because it’s the only way we can survive.
That is to say, tolerant liberalism must die, at least until globalism is defeated. I’m not denouncing “democracy” and its original tenets. However, I will not deny the fact that the west, in its quest for ultimate individual freedom and ultimate fairness, has foolishly abandoned its survival instincts for the sake of a naive pie-in-the-sky vision.
Most third-world cultures despise our progressive notions and laugh at our ideas of fairness. They only see us as an easy target to be ransacked. They see us as rubes, as easy marks. Their ideologies center on taking what can be taken from anyone outside of their tribal circles. They consider us a fat lamb ready for slaughter.
When I see events like those in Ireland this week, where riots have erupted after an African migrant sexually assaulted a 10-year-old Irish girl, I have to accept the basic tenets of tribalism which tell me that it is better to err on the side of caution and avoid integration with other cultures outside of the west as much as possible. It’s not about skin color, it’s about principles. It’s not about racism, it’s about self preservation.
Globalists have painted “tribalism” and “nationalism” as grotesque remnants of the barbaric past, and they have done this for strategic reasons.
Leftists and globalists desire the erasure of national boundaries; specifically, they’ve targeted western nations for subjugation. Why? Because the west is the fount of liberty and Christianity. In order to construct a global “new world order” based on Marxist atheism, luciferianism, moral relativism, etc., the west must be weakened or destroyed first.
The elites have determined that the most convenient weakness of the west is our liberal willingness to share our culture and its riches with outsiders. What better way to bring down a society than to flood it with ideologically opposed masses of people, and then attack anyone who complains as if they are not living up to their historic values of liberty.
This goes well beyond the Cloward-Piven Strategy, it’s not just about buying votes with welfare subsidies and open borders. No, this is about erasing the soul of western civilization forever.
Multiculturalism asks us to forsake our common sense and our instincts. It demands that we offer ourselves up as a sacrifice for the “greater good” of integration and coexistence. But there is no such thing as coexistence.
Third world migrants have no intention of tolerating our ideals; they would put us under their boot heel if they could. Leftists and globalists view patriots and conservatives and Christians with rabid disdain. They want us dead and gone because we are an obstacle to their power. They tell us this on a daily basis. Maybe we should start believing them and act accordingly?
There is no reason for us to tolerate them. We’re not taking the high road, we’re committing suicide.
Thomas Jefferson, a man keenly aware of the plight of migrants and the oppression taking place across the European world, was still highly reticent to accept the idea of mass immigration. He noted:
“They will bring with them the principles of the governments they leave, imbibed in their early youth; or, if able to throw them off, it will be in exchange for an unbounded licentiousness, passing, as is usual, from one extreme to another. It would be a miracle were they to stop precisely at the point of temperate liberty. These principles, with their language, they will transmit to their children. In proportion to their numbers, they will share with us the legislation. They will infuse into it their spirit, warp and bias its directions, and render it a heterogeneous, incoherent, distracted mass.”
In other words, Jefferson warned that migrants living most of their lives being indoctrinated by foreign beliefs might not have the capacity to understand the nuances of American life and liberty. They will instead take what they like from American culture while disregarding important factors of assimilation and responsibility. This is exactly what we are witnessing across the western world today in the face of mass immigration programs designed by globalists and administered by leftist politicians.
We might have a brief reprieve over the next few years with Donald Trump in office, but a permanent solution is not in place. Leftists have no intention of setting aside their open border efforts. Hell, the “No Kings” protests were basically an attempt to co-opt American patriotism in the name of open borders.
Woke leftists who hate America tried to pretend as if it’s the patriotic duty of Americans to support illegal immigration. If you love America, you have to be willing to destroy America.
Like I said, this is the essence of multiculturalism: Using our sense of fairness against us and weaponizing our empathy so that we are too scared to protect ourselves from the attack. The answer is to stop caring about fairness. The answer is to rediscover our tribalism, to reject multiculturalism, socialism and globalism and refuse to compromise any longer. The answer is to leave liberal concepts of tolerance behind.
Wednesday, October 22, 2025
Monday, October 20, 2025
Sunday, October 19, 2025
Saturday, October 18, 2025
Friday, October 17, 2025
Bondi DOJ Backs Warrantless Invasion Of Gun Owners' Homes
By Aidan Johnston, Director of Federal Affairs for Gun Owners of America,
The Department of Justice under Attorney General Pam Bondi is advancing an argument that threatens to hollow out the Fourth Amendment's core protection: that Americans may be secure in their homes against warrantless searches.
The lawsuit is Case v. Montana. After a difficult breakup, William Trevor Case was at home alone when police arrived for a so-called "welfare check." They spent nearly an hour outside his house. Officers walked around the property, shined flashlights through windows, and even discussed calling his relatives or reaching him directly. They never did. Instead, they retrieved rifles and a ballistic shield, broke down his door without a warrant, and shot him.
Case survived, but his rights did not.
During this so-called "emergency" situation, police stood around for 40 minutes, armed themselves with rifles and a ballistic shield, went into Trevor Case's home without a warrant, and shot him. https://t.co/vRpkDaKKX5 pic.twitter.com/lBTGWnszPT
— Gun Owners of America (@GunOwners) October 15, 2025
The Montana Supreme Court upheld the police's warrantless entry. Apparently, the government's "reasonable suspicion" that Treavor Case might need "help" was sufficient to justify an armed warrantless intrusion into his home. That standard is alarmingly low. The Fourth Amendment requires probable cause and judicial approval before government agents may enter a home. It does not permit entry based on a hunch.
And it was not as if obtaining a warrant would have been difficult. A recent Harvard Law Review study found that 93 percent of warrants are approved on first submission, often in less than three minutes. With modern technology, police can draft and submit warrant requests directly from their phones. The officers in Montana had nearly an hour to seek judicial approval. They chose not to.
The U.S. Supreme Court addressed a similar issue in Caniglia v. Strom in 2021. In that case, officers entered a man's home without a warrant after a domestic dispute, claiming they were acting as "community caretakers." The Court unanimously rejected that argument. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that the Fourth Amendment's protections do not vanish just because police say they are trying to help. The Court allowed for true emergencies—cases of imminent harm or death—but drew a clear line against open-ended "caretaking" exceptions.
The facts in Montana look nothing like an emergency. Body camera transcripts reveal that officers themselves doubted that Case required immediate aid. One noted that "chances are pretty slim" he needed urgent medical attention. They discussed staging medical personnel outside but decided against it. After forty minutes of hesitation, they declared the situation an "emergency" and broke in anyway.
In any other context, an armed entry without a warrant would be understood as unlawful. The Constitution does not stop at the property line of a gun owner. If a homeowner responds defensively to armed intruders, the law recognizes the basic right of self-defense. What transforms that same scenario into a police action is supposed to be the warrant requirement. Strip that away, and the police have no more right to enter than anyone else.
Pam Bondi's Department of Justice, however, has sided with Montana.
FYI @TheJusticeDept supports the warrantless home invasion of gunv owner Trevor Case.
— Gun Owners of America (@GunOwners) October 15, 2025
DOJ says federal agents (like @ATFHQ) "make warrantless entries into residences" & need to "prosecute cases" where they "encounter evidence of a crime" without a warrant. https://t.co/jsDfw4nci3 pic.twitter.com/a5dsrKiczu
In an amicus brief, DOJ argued that when police are "providing aid" rather than investigating a crime, they should not need probable cause or a warrant. That claim, if accepted, creates a dangerous loophole: police may simply reframe their role to avoid constitutional limits.
The risks are obvious. A neighbor calls for a welfare check. Officers arrive, say they are caretakers, and enter without a warrant. Inside, they confront a homeowner startled by strangers in his house. The encounter escalates, and the mere presence of a firearm becomes justification for force. What began as a welfare check ends as a shooting.
The Framers wrote the Fourth Amendment to prevent precisely this kind of abuse.
Judicial oversight was designed to ensure that government agents could not force their way into private homes unless a neutral magistrate agreed the evidence justified it. By lowering the bar from probable cause to suspicion, the Montana court has eroded that safeguard.
Caniglia was unanimous and recent. For Pam Bondi's DOJ to back Montana in this case is not simply inconsistent with precedent; it also undermines the Fourth Amendment principle that the home is a place of security. If the Supreme Court accepts this reasoning, the Fourth Amendment will be reduced to a formality.
Thursday, October 16, 2025
Wednesday, October 15, 2025
Tuesday, October 14, 2025
Monday, October 13, 2025
Sunday, October 12, 2025
Saturday, October 11, 2025
Thursday, October 9, 2025
Wednesday, October 8, 2025
Tuesday, October 7, 2025
Monday, October 6, 2025
Sunday, October 5, 2025
Saturday, October 4, 2025
Friday, October 3, 2025
Thursday, October 2, 2025
Trump goes Full Fascist with $70 Billion deal with Pfizer
In a stunning Betrayal of the American people - those that were murdered or injured and their loved ones, by the Covid "vaccine," - Trump and Kennedy give their support to Big Pharma, praising their "efforts" in developing their biological weapons aimed directly at the American people, and have made themselves complicit in Mass Murder.
If Trump thinks this is a "win," he needs to see what the people are saying.
"The Trump admin’s $70B deal with Pfizer isn’t “healthcare reform.” It’s corporate capture—cementing a failed mRNA platform tied to mass injury & death. Lawfare shields the guilty, while Americans pay the price. I’m disappointed. It’s tone deaf at best or premeditated (pre-medicated) attempted manslaughter at worse." - https://x.com/annvandersteel/status/1973342638825763110?t=EIzjdzje6ZOsGO4tJ9JrFw&s=09
"Can’t believe this happened. Praising the death eater himself Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla in the Oval Office. All to announce that Pfizer will receive $70 Billion from U.S. tax payers to expand Its mRNA empire." - https://x.com/ClaytonMorris/status/1973396655983698365?t=arxVZvbkCWtEk8GqRKAFEQ&s=09
https://x.com/annvandersteel/status/1973342638825763110?t=EIzjdzje6ZOsGO4tJ9JrFw&s=09
https://x.com/RealDrJaneRuby/status/1973244550643871989?t=8gEKSfSUxI4qRyd0XldHzw&s=09

Profit taking
This is one of their victims:
This is just one of the issues with Jew run America.


