Tuesday, October 31, 2023

Invasive Species Mimic their Hosts

 Psychopaths struggle to recognise genuine emotion | myVMC                                                           Psychopaths mimic emotions very accurately

We see this in nature, as described by this article in phys.org:

Cheating birds mimic host nestlings to deceive foster parents                                                               A parasitic purple indigobird nestling (right) alongside two nestlings of its host,                                                                  the jamesons firefinch. Credit: Claire Spottiswoode

"The common cuckoo is known for its deceitful nesting behavior—by laying eggs in the nests of other bird species, it fools host parents into rearing cuckoo chicks alongside their own. While common cuckoos mimic their host's eggs, new research has revealed that a group of parasitic finch species in Africa have evolved to mimic their host's chicks—and with astonishing accuracy. The study is published in the journal Evolution.

Working in the savannahs of Zambia, a team of international researchers collected images, sounds and videos over four years to reveal a striking and highly specialized form of . They focused on a group of finches occurring across much of Africa called the indigobirds and whydahs, of the genus Vidua.

Like cuckoos, the 19 different within this group of finches forego their parental duties and instead lay their eggs in the nests of other birds. Each species of indigobird and whydah chooses to lay its eggs in the nests of a particular species of grassfinch. Their hosts then incubate the foreign eggs, and feed the young alongside their own when they hatch.

Grassfinches are unusual in having brightly colored and distinctively patterned nestlings, and nestlings of different grassfinch species have their own unique appearance, begging calls and begging movements. Vidua finches are extremely specialized parasites, with each species mostly exploiting a single species.

Nestlings of these 'brood-parasitic' Vidua finches were found to mimic the appearance, sounds and movements of their grassfinch host's chicks, right down to the same elaborately colorful patterns on the inside of their mouths."

This is also found in psychopaths, as found in the Brock Study:

"...new research by Brock psychologist Angela Book shows that psychopaths are able to display emotions they don’t feel to the extent where everyone around them is convinced that those emotions are real.

“Psychopaths tend to lack fear and we know they lack remorse,” says Book. “We wanted to know if they were better able to fake these things.”

Book and her team conducted three experiments to test a theory called mimicry, “where these individuals are successful because they’re able to look normal; that would include emotional mimicry.” She says they use mimicry to avoid being detected.

“It’s difficult to spot a psychopath; in fact, they can look actually like they’re more genuine than other people,” says Book. “Part of it is that most people don’t have to fake emotions all the time, so they don’t have any practice at it. But someone who doesn’t feel these emotions will have practice at faking them, so they will probably be better at it.”

Most people would not consider psychopaths to be a different species from humans, that is, until they act out on their psychopathic tendencies.  It's then you will hear people call them "animals" "evil" and even "inhuman."

But what if they are in fact not human?  What is they are in fact an invasive species, or even a combination of a foreign species and humans?

That may sound far fetched, but that is exactly what the Scriptures say.  Consider Genesis 6:2 and 6:4, 

"That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.

There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown."

The clear implication in Genesis 6 is that the fallen angels procreated with human women producing giants.  We also know that in the book of Exodus Israel was fearful of going into the promised land because of the giants living there.  Eventually they did go in and fought wars with the giants and mostly prevailed.

There are also stories of native Americans fighting giants and eventually prevailing.  These legends are supported by giant skeletons found throughout the Americas. 

Well clearly the giant size and other anomalies such as two rows of teeth and six digits on their hands and feet were not a winning combination for these creatures.  So what if, over time, they were able to more clearly mimic humans, reducing their size and other differences?

We know there are no references to the existence of giants by Yeshua's time, yet there are most certainly references to "sons of the devil."  Consider John 8:44:

"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it."

Well perhaps you are thinking that Yeshua was speaking figuratively in this passage, but He makes it even more clear in His explanation of the parable of the wheat and tares in Matthew 13:38-39:

"The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one;

The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels."

This is as clear a reference back to Genesis 6 as is Jude 6, as there possible can be.  For your reference, here is Jude 6:

"And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day."

And Jude 6 is a clear reference to the book of Enoch, which explicitly states that the fallen angels, called Watchers, fornicated with human women.  This just couldn't be more clear to anyone with reasoning skills.

But let's look a little closer at the context of John 8:44.  Yeshua was speaking to the Pharisees when He called them the children of the devil.  If the children of the devil wanted to mimic humans, would they stop there, or go even further and try to mimic the religious sects as well?  Would they not go even further and claim to be the chosen race of God?  Read John 8 in this context and you will see that is exactly what they do.

This tactic of the devil has not changed today.  There are still false Christians and false Jews.  Again, the Scriptures address this issue.  Consider Revelation 2:9 and 3:9.

I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

You just can't get anymore clear than that.  But how do we distinguish between the real and the fake?  Yeshua tells us how.  He says in Matthew 7:15-20, 

"Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Therefore by their fruits you will know them."

Now let's consider what people are the largest purveyor of porn? Which group controls the media and narrative? Which group has controlled our government more than any other, yet is only 2% of our population and holds dual citizenship? Which group has pushed pedophilia and every sexual perversion on our school children? Which group is pushing this mass migration into every white country, and only white countries? Are these the fruits of the children of the kingdom or the children of the devil?

And why is this attack directly against the European and North American countries, the formerly white, Christian nations of the earth?  You don't see mass immigration into African nations, China or Japan.  Why is diversity imposed on white nations and only white nations? Why would the devil zero in on this group exclusively?

Could it be that the white race is actually the chosen race? Well, I don't think the devil would attack his own but it does make sense that he would attack God's people.  In fact there is plenty of evidence that when the Northern Kingdom of Israel escaped their captivity in the middle East that they migrated to Europe and America.

In the Apoccrypha (2 Esdras 13) we are told how some of the Ten Tribes escaped from Assyrian control via the upper Euphrates valleys. Later they became notorious in Asia Minor when they overthrew King Midas of Phrygia. These were the western group of GIMERA or CIMMERIANS, called KIMMEROI by the Greeks - another version of the Assyrian KHUMRI.

In the second year of Esar Haddon of Assyria (679 BC) another group of GIMERA were defeated by his forces and were pursued westward into Asia Minor.

Some of them settled in the Sinope area on the Black Sea, some migrated across the Sea to settle in the Crimea and in Arsereth (see 2 Esdras 13). On one of their forays they captured the city of Sardis. Finally about 600 BC, King Alyattes of Lydia drove them out of Asia Minor altogether. Their movements were westward - ever westward.

Most of the western CIMMERIAN group migrated up the Danube valley and settled as CELTS in central Europe between 500 BC and 100 BC.

Others moved north and west into sparsely inhabited regions of the Baltic, where they were given yet another name by the Romans - CIMBRI, a name probably derived from CIMMERIANS. These people were the ancestors of the Picts and Jutes.

Small numbers of Israelites followed Phoenician trade routes from the port of Miletus or the South West coast of Asia Minor. Some settled for a time in Spain then moved on to Ireland.

Now we have seen that most of the Western group of the "lost" Israelites were forced right through Asia Minor into Central Europe and finally to the shores of the North Sea; but the Eastern group were still dominated by Assyrian powers and their successors, being threatened by Babylonians and Medes from the south.

This eastern part of Israel although known as GIMIRA was also known to the Assyrians as ISKUZA, a name derived from the name ISAAC - one of the names ancient Israel used to describe themselves, "sons of ISSAC".

After the fall of the Assyrian capital Nineveh in 612 BC, the main body of Scythian Israelites came under such pressure from the Medes that they were forced northwards through the Dariel Pass in the Caucasus mountains and into the steppe region of southern Russia.

As wave after wave of these people were forced through the Caucasus [who are called Caucasians], the leaders in the west crossed the rivers Don and Dniper and came into contact with CIMMERIAN Israel groups who had earlier moved across the Black Sea, thus pushing them westward along the valley of the Danube into Central Europe.

Although the Scythians established themselves in the area of southern Russia from the 6th to the 3rd centuries BC, they found themselves squeezed between a people advancing from the east - the Sarmatians - and the CELTS, already occupying Central Europe to the west. Consequently, they were forced northward towards the North Sea and the Baltic. This group formed the last of the migrating Israelites to arrive in these Islands. The Anglo-Saxon group from the area now called Germany arriving between 400 and 600 AD.

Others moving northwards through Jutland became known as Danes and Vikings. Others settled for a time in northern France and were known as Northmen or Normans. These Normans arrived in the 11th century, the last large group, finally completing the regathering of what Sir Arthur Keith, world-famous ethnologist, described as one family - NOT a racially mixed group.

In exile, the Nation of Israel became divided into two main groups, one in the upper Euphrates area and the other in Media. These two groups migrated by different routes and at different times. Thus, they arrived in Europe in comparatively small groups over a long period of time, some eventually settling in North America.

When you look at where the Apostle Paul went on his missionary journeys, it makes perfect since that he would go to the lost tribes of the house of Israel.  Yeshua also said that He had another flock in John 10:16.

And other sheep I have which are not of this fold; them also I must bring, and they will hear My voice; and there will be one flock and one shepherd.

It was never God's intent that Israel be divided between the Northern Kingdom of Israel and the Southern Kingdom of Judah. And we can see from Yeshua's word here that He intends to reunite them into one Kingdom.

Of course the devil's strategy is to destroy God's people, and we can see that being worked out today with the constant attacks on white people and their nations.  The children of the devil have been very effective at taking over the leadership of formerly Christian nations by fraud and blackmail, using the banking systems they have established over centuries.  The Rothschild's are famous for this, and it's not surprising that they call themselves "Jews" as part of their strategy, being the master mimickers that they are.

This all brings us to the Rothschild bankster construct known as the modern State of Israel. This is clearly not the Israel of the Scriptures, as their fruit bears witness.  Although there may be actual sons of Judah living there, the leadership as in Yeshua's time on earth, are clearly not descendants of Judah (Jews) of the Scriptures, and further, if you are a descendant of the Northern Tribes you are not allowed citizenship there at all.

So effective is the deception, most of the descendants of Israel don't even know who they are, but even believe that the devil's imitation of Israel is actually God's chosen nation! 

Even worse, the true Israel no longer keep Yehovah's commandments believing the lie that they were done away with when Yeshua died on the cross, even though Yeshua Himself said that in Matthew 5:17-19;

"Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law [the Torah], till all be fulfilled.

Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven."

So the true Israel that so readily accepted Yeshua as their Savior, has now grown fat, polluted and stupefied eating bacon for breakfast and ham for Easter.  Such is the fallen state of Yehovah's chosen people, numbed by the lies of modern churchianity and spiritually dead as typified by the Church in Laodicea.

I therefore remind you, what the Apostle John wrote concerning sin in 1 John 3:4,

"Whosoever commits sin transgresses also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law."

What law exactly do you think John was referring to?  In the context of the Scriptures it can only mean the Torah.

Of course this will mean nothing to the fake Christians and they will continue their lawlessness and when they meet Yeshua, He will say to them,

"I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work Torahlessness."

Right up until then, they will be comfortably numb.


1 comment:

  1. All Zionists are parasites. The world is infested.

    ReplyDelete